9th Circuit Nevada
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Nevada District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
69.3
Avg Months (FY2024)
304
Cases (FY2024)
11%
Within Guidelines
85%
Guilty Pleas
89%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 304 69.3 11% 4% 0%
FY2023 292 70.9 11% 4% 0%
FY2022 337 63.0 8% 4% 0%
FY2021 241 65.1 10% 6% 0%
FY2020 321 52.6 19% 6% 0%
FY2019 372 55.3 20% 3% 0%
FY2018 377 49.9 29% 6% 0%
FY2017 342 60.8 15% 8% 0%
FY2016 259 58.3 17% 6% 0%
FY2015 264 47.9 18% 8% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-21.8%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Nevada Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-21.8Within GL avg-39Above GL avg-6Below GL avg15
Nevada Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
11%
33 cases
Above Guidelines
4%
13 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

69.3 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-21.8% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

11%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

89%

of 304 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 11.0%

33 cases

Above Guidelines 4.0%

13 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Nevada District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Nevada District (9th Circuit, Nevada) sentenced 304 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 69.3 months. Of those cases, 11% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 4% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 89% of cases, and 85% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Nevada District ran a disparity of -21.8% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Nevada District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 146 cases and an average sentence of 76.0 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Nevada District is part of the 9th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 9th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Nevada District?
In FY2024, the Nevada District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 69.3 months across 304 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Nevada follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 11% of sentences in the Nevada District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 4% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Nevada District had a disparity of -21.8% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Nevada District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Nevada District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.