9th Circuit Oregon
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Oregon District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
57.6
Avg Months (FY2024)
317
Cases (FY2024)
5%
Within Guidelines
95%
Guilty Pleas
65%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 317 57.6 5% 28% 0%
FY2023 359 63.3 3% 26% 0%
FY2022 374 51.6 3% 25% 0%
FY2021 358 45.1 3% 34% 0%
FY2020 269 36.7 14% 17% 0%
FY2019 466 38.3 17% 17% 0%
FY2018 507 37.0 25% 10% 0%
FY2017 462 44.8 17% 8% 0%
FY2016 534 47.7 13% 13% 0%
FY2015 508 46.1 14% 11% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-39.7%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Oregon Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-39.7Within GL avg-45Above GL avg18Below GL avg15
Oregon Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
5%
16 cases
Above Guidelines
28%
89 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

57.6 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-39.7% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

5%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

65%

of 317 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 5.0%

16 cases

Above Guidelines 28.0%

89 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Oregon District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Oregon District (9th Circuit, Oregon) sentenced 317 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 57.6 months. Of those cases, 5% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 28% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 65% of cases, and 95% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Oregon District ran a disparity of -39.7% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Oregon District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 99 cases and an average sentence of 69.4 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Oregon District is part of the 9th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 9th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Oregon District?
In FY2024, the Oregon District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 57.6 months across 317 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Oregon follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 5% of sentences in the Oregon District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 28% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Oregon District had a disparity of -39.7% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Oregon District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Oregon District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.