7th Circuit Illinois
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Central Illinois District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
69.2
Avg Months (FY2024)
549
Cases (FY2024)
3%
Within Guidelines
90%
Guilty Pleas
90%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 549 69.2 3% 4% 0%
FY2023 620 65.6 2% 3% 0%
FY2022 621 66.0 1% 4% 0%
FY2021 619 58.4 2% 5% 0%
FY2020 540 50.7 4% 4% 0%
FY2019 655 56.9 5% 4% 0%
FY2018 740 57.2 2% 4% 0%
FY2017 640 65.6 3% 3% 0%
FY2016 640 60.9 3% 3% 0%
FY2015 725 60.7 1% 4% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

+15.2%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Central Illinois Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district15.2Within GL avg-47Above GL avg-6Below GL avg15
Central Illinois Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
3%
19 cases
Above Guidelines
4%
21 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

69.2 months

FY2024 national benchmark

+15.2% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

3%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

90%

of 549 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 3.0%

19 cases

Above Guidelines 4.0%

21 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Central Illinois District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Central Illinois District (7th Circuit, Illinois) sentenced 549 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 69.2 months. Of those cases, 3% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 4% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 90% of cases, and 90% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Central Illinois District ran a disparity of +15.2% in FY2024. Sentences here trended longer than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Central Illinois District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 170 cases and an average sentence of 70.6 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Central Illinois District is part of the 7th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 7th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Central Illinois District?
In FY2024, the Central Illinois District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 69.2 months across 549 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Central Illinois follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 3% of sentences in the Central Illinois District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 4% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Central Illinois District had a disparity of +15.2% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Central Illinois District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Central Illinois District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.