6th Circuit Michigan
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Eastern Michigan District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
58.8
Avg Months (FY2024)
117
Cases (FY2024)
4%
Within Guidelines
97%
Guilty Pleas
90%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 117 58.8 4% 5% 0%
FY2023 146 68.8 5% 3% 0%
FY2022 143 83.0 1% 1% 0%
FY2021 132 70.7 7% 3% 0%
FY2020 151 55.5 13% 3% 0%
FY2019 188 68.5 10% 3% 0%
FY2018 156 72.8 11% 6% 0%
FY2017 116 77.1 9% 9% 0%
FY2016 125 54.0 9% 4% 0%
FY2015 119 78.5 2% 9% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-8.0%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Eastern Michigan Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-8Within GL avg-46Above GL avg-5Below GL avg15
Eastern Michigan Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
4%
5 cases
Above Guidelines
5%
6 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

58.8 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-8.0% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

4%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

90%

of 117 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 4.0%

5 cases

Above Guidelines 5.0%

6 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Eastern Michigan District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Eastern Michigan District (6th Circuit, Michigan) sentenced 117 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 58.8 months. Of those cases, 4% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 5% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 90% of cases, and 97% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Eastern Michigan District ran a disparity of -8.0% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Eastern Michigan District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 40 cases and an average sentence of 74.2 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Eastern Michigan District is part of the 6th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 6th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Eastern Michigan District?
In FY2024, the Eastern Michigan District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 58.8 months across 117 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Eastern Michigan follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 4% of sentences in the Eastern Michigan District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 5% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Eastern Michigan District had a disparity of -8.0% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Eastern Michigan District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Eastern Michigan District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.