3rd Circuit New Jersey
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

New Jersey District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
34.6
Avg Months (FY2024)
165
Cases (FY2024)
19%
Within Guidelines
98%
Guilty Pleas
92%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 165 34.6 19% 4% 0%
FY2023 137 29.0 16% 4% 0%
FY2022 135 39.1 12% 1% 0%
FY2021 124 23.3 15% 4% 0%
FY2020 155 31.8 8% 5% 0%
FY2019 166 35.2 15% 1% 0%
FY2018 161 42.9 14% 4% 0%
FY2017 178 41.5 11% 3% 0%
FY2016 188 36.1 12% 4% 0%
FY2015 179 38.9 6% 5% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-61.8%
vs. national average (FY2024)

New Jersey Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-61.8Within GL avg-31Above GL avg-6Below GL avg15
New Jersey Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
19%
32 cases
Above Guidelines
4%
6 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

34.6 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-61.8% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

19%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

92%

of 165 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 19.0%

32 cases

Above Guidelines 4.0%

6 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the New Jersey District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the New Jersey District (3rd Circuit, New Jersey) sentenced 165 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 34.6 months. Of those cases, 19% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 4% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 92% of cases, and 98% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the New Jersey District ran a disparity of -61.8% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the New Jersey District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 68 cases and an average sentence of 37.9 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The New Jersey District is part of the 3rd Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 3rd Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the New Jersey District?
In FY2024, the New Jersey District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 34.6 months across 165 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in New Jersey follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 19% of sentences in the New Jersey District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 4% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The New Jersey District had a disparity of -61.8% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the New Jersey District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the New Jersey District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.