8th Circuit North Dakota
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

North Dakota District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
66.7
Avg Months (FY2024)
327
Cases (FY2024)
8%
Within Guidelines
95%
Guilty Pleas
93%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 327 66.7 8% 1% 0%
FY2023 413 58.9 8% 0% 0%
FY2022 345 66.7 7% 1% 0%
FY2021 289 69.4 8% 3% 0%
FY2020 252 55.6 14% 2% 0%
FY2019 329 59.3 16% 2% 0%
FY2018 370 56.8 13% 1% 0%
FY2017 326 57.8 18% 2% 0%
FY2016 361 76.6 16% 2% 0%
FY2015 424 46.0 28% 5% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-22.2%
vs. national average (FY2024)

North Dakota Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-22.2Within GL avg-42Above GL avg-9Below GL avg15
North Dakota Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
8%
27 cases
Above Guidelines
1%
4 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

66.7 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-22.2% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

8%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

93%

of 327 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 8.0%

27 cases

Above Guidelines 1.0%

4 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the North Dakota District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the North Dakota District (8th Circuit, North Dakota) sentenced 327 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 66.7 months. Of those cases, 8% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 1% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 93% of cases, and 95% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the North Dakota District ran a disparity of -22.2% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the North Dakota District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 179 cases and an average sentence of 60.8 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The North Dakota District is part of the 8th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 8th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the North Dakota District?
In FY2024, the North Dakota District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 66.7 months across 327 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in North Dakota follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 8% of sentences in the North Dakota District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 1% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The North Dakota District had a disparity of -22.2% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the North Dakota District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the North Dakota District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.