2nd Circuit vs. 2nd Circuit

Eastern New York vs. Southern New York

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2025 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2025)
74.0 mo
Eastern New York
vs
64.9 mo
Southern New York
Eastern sentences 9.1 mo longer
Cases (FY2025)
604
Eastern New York
vs
899
Southern New York
Southern handles 1.5× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
-15.5%
Eastern New York
vs
-19.1%
Southern New York

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Eastern New York

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 22% (110)
Above Guidelines 3% (13)
Below Guidelines 76% (385)
Guilty Pleas
88%
Prison Sentences
82%

Southern New York

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 24% (198)
Above Guidelines 2% (14)
Below Guidelines 75% (630)
Guilty Pleas
65%
Prison Sentences
90%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Eastern New York Southern New York Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 74.0 64.9 York
Total Cases 604 899
Within Guidelines % 22% 24% York
Above Guidelines % 3% 2% York
Below Guidelines % 76% 75%
Guilty Plea Rate 88% 65%
Prison Sentence Rate 82% 90%
Disparity vs. National -15.5% -19.1% York

What This Eastern New York vs. Southern New York Comparison Reveals

In FY2025, the Eastern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 604 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 74.0 months, while the Southern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 899 cases at an average of 64.9 months. That is a 9.1-month gap - the Eastern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Southern processed roughly 1.5× more defendants than Eastern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Eastern New York sentenced 22% within the range, 3% above, and 76% below. In Southern New York, the corresponding figures were 24% within, 2% above, and 75% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 88% vs. 65%, and prison-sentence rates at 82% vs. 90% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Eastern New York ran a disparity of -15.5% and Southern New York ran -19.1%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Eastern New York 2nd Circuit · New York · 604 cases in FY2025
Southern New York 2nd Circuit · New York · 899 cases in FY2025

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2025. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2025; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.