2nd Circuit vs. 2nd Circuit

Eastern New York vs. Southern New York

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
54.7 mo
Eastern New York
vs
61.7 mo
Southern New York
Eastern sentences 7.0 mo shorter
Cases (FY2024)
507
Eastern New York
vs
1,048
Southern New York
Southern handles 2.1× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
-9.3%
Eastern New York
vs
-16.5%
Southern New York

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Eastern New York

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 36% (181)
Above Guidelines 7% (37)
Below Guidelines N/A (0)
Booker Variance N/A (0)
Guilty Pleas
82%
Prison Sentences
89%

Southern New York

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 4% (43)
Above Guidelines 2% (23)
Below Guidelines N/A (0)
Booker Variance N/A (0)
Guilty Pleas
62%
Prison Sentences
90%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Eastern New York Southern New York Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 54.7 61.7 York
Total Cases 507 1,048
Within Guidelines % 36% 4% York
Above Guidelines % 7% 2% York
Below Guidelines % N/A N/A
Guilty Plea Rate 82% 62%
Prison Sentence Rate 89% 90%
Disparity vs. National -9.3% -16.5% York

What This Eastern New York vs. Southern New York Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Eastern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 507 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 54.7 months, while the Southern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 1,048 cases at an average of 61.7 months. That is a 7.0-month gap — the Southern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Southern processed roughly 2.1× more defendants than Eastern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Eastern New York, 36% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 7% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Southern New York, the corresponding figures were 4% within, 2% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 82% vs. 62%, and prison-sentence rates at 89% vs. 90% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Eastern New York ran a disparity of -9.3% and Southern New York ran -16.5%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Eastern New York 2nd Circuit · New York · 507 cases in FY2024
Southern New York 2nd Circuit · New York · 1,048 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Percentages are calculated from the total sentenced cases for each district in FY2024. "Within guidelines" means the judge imposed a sentence within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) outside the guidelines range.

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.