4th Circuit North Carolina
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Western North Carolina District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
82.4
Avg Months (FY2024)
777
Cases (FY2024)
8%
Within Guidelines
69%
Guilty Pleas
75%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 777 82.4 8% 19% 0%
FY2023 884 82.4 8% 15% 0%
FY2022 919 72.1 12% 19% 0%
FY2021 968 76.8 10% 23% 0%
FY2020 813 65.7 14% 25% 0%
FY2019 1,211 63.7 21% 23% 0%
FY2018 1,331 80.3 15% 28% 0%
FY2017 1,181 78.3 13% 30% 0%
FY2016 1,413 86.9 13% 34% 0%
FY2015 1,461 67.3 15% 37% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-6.0%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Western North Carolina Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-6Within GL avg-42Above GL avg9Below GL avg15
Western North Carolina Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
8%
65 cases
Above Guidelines
19%
145 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

82.4 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-6.0% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

8%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

75%

of 777 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 8.0%

65 cases

Above Guidelines 19.0%

145 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Western North Carolina District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Western North Carolina District (4th Circuit, North Carolina) sentenced 777 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 82.4 months. Of those cases, 8% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 19% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 75% of cases, and 69% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Western North Carolina District ran a disparity of -6.0% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Western North Carolina District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 194 cases and an average sentence of 94.9 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Western North Carolina District is part of the 4th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 4th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Western North Carolina District?
In FY2024, the Western North Carolina District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 82.4 months across 777 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Western North Carolina follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 8% of sentences in the Western North Carolina District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 19% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Western North Carolina District had a disparity of -6.0% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Western North Carolina District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Western North Carolina District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.