6th Circuit Michigan
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Western Michigan District

Open-data reference.

PlainSentencing home → About this data

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL

Top Offenses (FY2024)

No offense data available.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Western Michigan District is part of the 6th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 6th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Eastern Kentucky
Kentucky
84.4 mo avg · 517 cases
Western Tennessee
Tennessee
81.8 mo avg · 380 cases
Northern Ohio
Ohio
120.2 mo avg · 352 cases
Middle Tennessee
Tennessee
137.0 mo avg · 328 cases
Eastern Tennessee
Tennessee
95.5 mo avg · 295 cases
Compare Western Michigan with Eastern Kentucky

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Western Michigan District?
In FY2024, the Western Michigan District Court imposed an average federal sentence of N/A months across N/A cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Western Michigan follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, N/A% of sentences in the Western Michigan District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. N/A% were above guidelines (upward departures) and N/A% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Western Michigan District had a disparity of N/A% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Western Michigan District, N/A% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Western Michigan District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.

Learn More About Federal Sentencing

Understanding Federal Sentencing

How federal sentencing guidelines work, from offense levels to criminal history categories.

Sentencing Disparity Explained

What drives differences in sentencing outcomes between federal districts.

Reading Sentencing Data

How to interpret the statistics and comparisons in PlainSentencing.
All Districts
Compare Districts District Rankings

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.