2nd Circuit Connecticut
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Connecticut District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
63.2
Avg Months (FY2024)
249
Cases (FY2024)
4%
Within Guidelines
81%
Guilty Pleas
88%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 249 63.2 4% 2% 0%
FY2023 355 56.3 1% 1% 0%
FY2022 335 55.8 2% 4% 0%
FY2021 302 52.4 4% 7% 0%
FY2020 353 50.9 3% 4% 0%
FY2019 349 45.8 5% 3% 0%
FY2018 322 49.8 5% 5% 0%
FY2017 345 54.8 4% 5% 0%
FY2016 304 49.7 1% 4% 0%
FY2015 334 52.2 1% 6% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-14.6%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Connecticut Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-14.6Within GL avg-46Above GL avg-8Below GL avg15
Connecticut Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
4%
9 cases
Above Guidelines
2%
5 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

63.2 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-14.6% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

4%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

88%

of 249 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 4.0%

9 cases

Above Guidelines 2.0%

5 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Connecticut District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Connecticut District (2nd Circuit, Connecticut) sentenced 249 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 63.2 months. Of those cases, 4% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 2% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 88% of cases, and 81% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Connecticut District ran a disparity of -14.6% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Connecticut District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 112 cases and an average sentence of 52.8 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Connecticut District is part of the 2nd Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 2nd Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Connecticut District?
In FY2024, the Connecticut District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 63.2 months across 249 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Connecticut follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 4% of sentences in the Connecticut District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 2% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Connecticut District had a disparity of -14.6% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Connecticut District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Connecticut District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.