11th Circuit Alabama
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Southern Alabama District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
70.8
Avg Months (FY2024)
477
Cases (FY2024)
6%
Within Guidelines
80%
Guilty Pleas
89%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 477 70.8 6% 3% 0%
FY2023 585 70.0 6% 4% 0%
FY2022 609 70.7 11% 1% 0%
FY2021 544 62.6 15% 3% 0%
FY2020 490 66.1 15% 3% 0%
FY2019 513 60.2 12% 3% 0%
FY2018 570 67.3 8% 7% 0%
FY2017 530 60.1 6% 4% 0%
FY2016 542 60.8 4% 3% 0%
FY2015 592 71.5 4% 4% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

+15.6%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Southern Alabama Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district15.6Within GL avg-44Above GL avg-7Below GL avg15
Southern Alabama Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
6%
30 cases
Above Guidelines
3%
15 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

70.8 months

FY2024 national benchmark

+15.6% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

6%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

89%

of 477 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 6.0%

30 cases

Above Guidelines 3.0%

15 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Southern Alabama District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Southern Alabama District (11th Circuit, Alabama) sentenced 477 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 70.8 months. Of those cases, 6% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 3% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 89% of cases, and 80% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Southern Alabama District ran a disparity of +15.6% in FY2024. Sentences here trended longer than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Southern Alabama District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 146 cases and an average sentence of 101.2 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Southern Alabama District is part of the 11th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 11th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Southern Alabama District?
In FY2024, the Southern Alabama District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 70.8 months across 477 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Southern Alabama follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 6% of sentences in the Southern Alabama District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 3% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Southern Alabama District had a disparity of +15.6% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Southern Alabama District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Southern Alabama District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.