10th Circuit New Mexico
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

New Mexico District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
22.6
Avg Months (FY2024)
2,634
Cases (FY2024)
18%
Within Guidelines
98%
Guilty Pleas
89%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 2,634 22.6 18% 2% 0%
FY2023 3,189 24.2 14% 1% 0%
FY2022 3,474 27.5 12% 2% 0%
FY2021 2,927 25.7 10% 2% 0%
FY2020 3,499 22.1 16% 2% 0%
FY2019 4,089 21.1 22% 2% 0%
FY2018 3,889 25.4 17% 2% 0%
FY2017 2,888 28.2 15% 3% 0%
FY2016 2,849 32.0 11% 2% 0%
FY2015 3,391 29.8 11% 2% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

-29.0%
vs. national average (FY2024)

New Mexico Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district-29Within GL avg-32Above GL avg-8Below GL avg15
New Mexico Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
18%
469 cases
Above Guidelines
2%
56 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

22.6 months

FY2024 national benchmark

-29.0% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

18%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

89%

of 2,634 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 18.0%

469 cases

Above Guidelines 2.0%

56 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the New Mexico District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the New Mexico District (10th Circuit, New Mexico) sentenced 2,634 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 22.6 months. Of those cases, 18% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 2% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 89% of cases, and 98% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the New Mexico District ran a disparity of -29.0% in FY2024. Sentences here trended shorter than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the New Mexico District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 1103 cases and an average sentence of 33.6 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The New Mexico District is part of the 10th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 10th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the New Mexico District?
In FY2024, the New Mexico District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 22.6 months across 2,634 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in New Mexico follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 18% of sentences in the New Mexico District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 2% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The New Mexico District had a disparity of -29.0% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the New Mexico District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the New Mexico District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.