10th Circuit Kansas
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Kansas District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
106.1
Avg Months (FY2024)
783
Cases (FY2024)
1%
Within Guidelines
85%
Guilty Pleas
87%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 783 106.1 1% 6% 0%
FY2023 841 104.4 2% 4% 0%
FY2022 810 90.9 2% 2% 0%
FY2021 582 91.8 2% 2% 0%
FY2020 697 91.1 4% 2% 0%
FY2019 772 91.8 3% 2% 0%
FY2018 779 90.9 2% 3% 0%
FY2017 804 81.2 1% 4% 0%
FY2016 835 85.1 3% 4% 0%
FY2015 897 85.9 2% 5% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

+36.0%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Kansas Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district36Within GL avg-49Above GL avg-4Below GL avg15
Kansas Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
1%
11 cases
Above Guidelines
6%
49 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

106.1 months

FY2024 national benchmark

+36.0% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

1%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

87%

of 783 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 1.0%

11 cases

Above Guidelines 6.0%

49 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Kansas District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Kansas District (10th Circuit, Kansas) sentenced 783 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 106.1 months. Of those cases, 1% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 6% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 87% of cases, and 85% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Kansas District ran a disparity of +36.0% in FY2024. Sentences here trended longer than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Kansas District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Counterfeiting/Forgery" with 339 cases and an average sentence of 114.2 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Kansas District is part of the 10th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 10th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Kansas District?
In FY2024, the Kansas District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 106.1 months across 783 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Kansas follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 1% of sentences in the Kansas District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 6% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Kansas District had a disparity of +36.0% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Kansas District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Kansas District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.