Average Sentence
60.4 months
FY2024 national benchmark
+41.5% vs natl avg
Open-data reference.
Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC
| Year | Cases | Avg (mo) | Within GL | Above GL | Below GL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 1,377 | 60.4 | 17% | 4% | 0% |
| FY2023 | 1,552 | 57.6 | 17% | 3% | 0% |
| FY2022 | 1,719 | 63.5 | 12% | 3% | 0% |
| FY2021 | 813 | 58.1 | 11% | 4% | 0% |
| FY2020 | 1,326 | 49.2 | 21% | 3% | 0% |
| FY2019 | 1,987 | 49.9 | 23% | 4% | 0% |
| FY2018 | 2,251 | 51.9 | 22% | 5% | 0% |
| FY2017 | 2,365 | 58.6 | 20% | 4% | 0% |
| FY2016 | 2,234 | 58.8 | 20% | 2% | 0% |
| FY2015 | 2,236 | 55.5 | 22% | 4% | 0% |
Average Sentence
60.4 months
FY2024 national benchmark
+41.5% vs natl avg
Guideline Compliance
17%
Within USSC range
Prison Rate
90%
of 1,377 cases
234 cases
60 upward departures
0 downward departures
0 post-Booker variances
In FY2024, the Middle Alabama District (11th Circuit, Alabama) sentenced 1,377 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 60.4 months. Of those cases, 17% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 4% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 90% of cases, and 68% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.
Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Middle Alabama District ran a disparity of +41.5% in FY2024. Sentences here trended longer than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.
Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Middle Alabama District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "Drug Simple Possession" with 338 cases and an average sentence of 13.9 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.
Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Middle Alabama District is part of the 11th Circuit.
"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics
Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.
How federal sentencing guidelines work, from offense levels to criminal history categories.
What drives differences in sentencing outcomes between federal districts.
How to interpret the statistics and comparisons in PlainSentencing.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.