Southern New York vs. Western New York
Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC
Guideline Compliance Breakdown
Southern New York
2nd CircuitWestern New York
2nd CircuitFull Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Southern New York | Western New York | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg Sentence (months) | 61.7 | 73.3 | York |
| Total Cases | 1,048 | 365 | |
| Within Guidelines % | 4% | 8% | York |
| Above Guidelines % | 2% | 5% | York |
| Below Guidelines % | N/A | N/A | |
| Guilty Plea Rate | 62% | 99% | |
| Prison Sentence Rate | 90% | 87% | |
| Disparity vs. National | -16.5% | -17.2% | York |
Top Offenses (FY2024)
What This Southern New York vs. Western New York Comparison Reveals
In FY2024, the Southern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 1,048 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 61.7 months, while the Western New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 365 cases at an average of 73.3 months. That is a 11.6-month gap — the Western District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Southern processed roughly 2.9× more defendants than Western, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.
Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Southern New York, 4% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 2% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Western New York, the corresponding figures were 8% within, 5% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 62% vs. 99%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 87% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.
Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Southern New York ran a disparity of -16.5% and Western New York ran -17.2%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.
About This Comparison
Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Percentages are calculated from the total sentenced cases for each district in FY2024. "Within guidelines" means the judge imposed a sentence within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) outside the guidelines range.
Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics
Related District Comparisons
Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.