2nd Circuit vs. 2nd Circuit

Connecticut vs. Southern New York

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
63.2 mo
Connecticut
vs
61.7 mo
Southern New York
Connecticut sentences 1.5 mo longer
Cases (FY2024)
249
Connecticut
vs
1,048
Southern New York
Southern handles 4.2× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
-14.6%
Connecticut
vs
-16.5%
Southern New York

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Connecticut

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 23% (53)
Above Guidelines 4% (10)
Below Guidelines 72% (165)
Guilty Pleas
81%
Prison Sentences
88%

Southern New York

2nd Circuit
Within Guidelines 21% (212)
Above Guidelines 2% (22)
Below Guidelines 77% (766)
Guilty Pleas
62%
Prison Sentences
90%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Connecticut Southern New York Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 63.2 61.7 York
Total Cases 249 1,048
Within Guidelines % 23% 21% Connecticut
Above Guidelines % 4% 2% York
Below Guidelines % 72% 77%
Guilty Plea Rate 81% 62%
Prison Sentence Rate 88% 90%
Disparity vs. National -14.6% -16.5% York

What This Connecticut vs. Southern New York Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Connecticut District (2nd Circuit) handled 249 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 63.2 months, while the Southern New York District (2nd Circuit) handled 1,048 cases at an average of 61.7 months. That is a 1.5-month gap - the Connecticut District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Southern processed roughly 4.2× more defendants than Connecticut, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Connecticut sentenced 23% within the range, 4% above, and 72% below. In Southern New York, the corresponding figures were 21% within, 2% above, and 77% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 81% vs. 62%, and prison-sentence rates at 88% vs. 90% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Connecticut ran a disparity of -14.6% and Southern New York ran -16.5%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Connecticut 2nd Circuit · Connecticut · 249 cases in FY2024
Southern New York 2nd Circuit · New York · 1,048 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.