Kansas vs. New Mexico

What This Kansas vs. New Mexico Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Kansas District (10th Circuit) handled 783 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 106.1 months, while the New Mexico District (10th Circuit) handled 2,634 cases at an average of 22.6 months. That is a 83.5-month gap — the Kansas District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: New processed roughly 3.4× more defendants than Kansas, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Kansas, 1% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 6% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In New Mexico, the corresponding figures were 18% within, 2% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 85% vs. 98%, and prison-sentence rates at 87% vs. 89% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Kansas ran a disparity of +36.0% and New Mexico ran -29.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.