Eastern Arkansas vs. North Dakota

What This Eastern Arkansas vs. North Dakota Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Eastern Arkansas District (8th Circuit) handled 8,035 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 26.0 months, while the North Dakota District (8th Circuit) handled 327 cases at an average of 66.7 months. That is a 40.7-month gap - the North District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Eastern processed roughly 24.6× more defendants than North, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Eastern Arkansas sentenced 69% within the range, 15% above, and 15% below. In North Dakota, the corresponding figures were 32% within, 4% above, and 64% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 23% vs. 95%, and prison-sentence rates at 89% vs. 93% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Eastern Arkansas ran a disparity of -5.0% and North Dakota ran -22.2%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.