10th Circuit vs. 10th Circuit

Colorado vs. New Mexico

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
40.8 mo
Colorado
vs
22.6 mo
New Mexico
Colorado sentences 18.2 mo longer
Cases (FY2024)
477
Colorado
vs
2,634
New Mexico
New handles 5.5× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
-27.7%
Colorado
vs
-29.0%
New Mexico

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Colorado

10th Circuit
Within Guidelines 12% (51)
Above Guidelines 2% (9)
Below Guidelines 86% (376)
Guilty Pleas
85%
Prison Sentences
90%

New Mexico

10th Circuit
Within Guidelines 14% (343)
Above Guidelines 2% (39)
Below Guidelines 85% (2,113)
Guilty Pleas
98%
Prison Sentences
89%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Colorado New Mexico Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 40.8 22.6 Mexico
Total Cases 477 2,634
Within Guidelines % 12% 14% Mexico
Above Guidelines % 2% 2% -
Below Guidelines % 86% 85%
Guilty Plea Rate 85% 98%
Prison Sentence Rate 90% 89%
Disparity vs. National -27.7% -29.0% Mexico

What This Colorado vs. New Mexico Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Colorado District (10th Circuit) handled 477 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 40.8 months, while the New Mexico District (10th Circuit) handled 2,634 cases at an average of 22.6 months. That is a 18.2-month gap - the Colorado District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: New processed roughly 5.5× more defendants than Colorado, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Colorado sentenced 12% within the range, 2% above, and 86% below. In New Mexico, the corresponding figures were 14% within, 2% above, and 85% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 85% vs. 98%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 89% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Colorado ran a disparity of -27.7% and New Mexico ran -29.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Colorado 10th Circuit · Colorado · 477 cases in FY2024
New Mexico 10th Circuit · New Mexico · 2,634 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.