9th Circuit Alaska
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Alaska District

Open-data reference.

Federal criminal sentencing data · FY2015–FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
125.2
Avg Months (FY2024)
311
Cases (FY2024)
1%
Within Guidelines
54%
Guilty Pleas
97%
Prison Sentences

Sentencing Trends (FY2015–FY2024)

YearCasesAvg (mo)Within GLAbove GLBelow GL
FY2024 311 125.2 1% 0% 0%
FY2023 215 137.1 0% 0% 0%
FY2022 179 105.3 2% 2% 0%
FY2021 89 93.0 0% 1% 0%
FY2020 105 76.6 6% 5% 0%
FY2019 101 81.7 0% 4% 0%
FY2018 96 78.1 6% 8% 0%
FY2017 107 74.7 7% 12% 0%
FY2016 100 79.8 2% 14% 0%
FY2015 99 74.4 1% 10% 0%

Top Offenses (FY2024)

Sentencing Disparity

+11.0%
vs. national average (FY2024)

Alaska Disparity Overview (FY2024)

This district11Within GL avg-49Above GL avg-10Below GL avg15
Alaska Disparity Overview (FY2024) — Deviation from national benchmarks for key sentencing metrics

Sentencing Breakdown (FY2024)

Within Guidelines
1%
2 cases
Above Guidelines
0%
1 cases
Below Guidelines
0%
0 cases
Booker Variance
0%
0 cases

Average Sentence

125.2 months

FY2024 national benchmark

+11.0% vs natl avg

Guideline Compliance

1%

Within USSC range

Prison Rate

97%

of 311 cases

Guideline Adherence Breakdown

Within Guidelines 1.0%

2 cases

Above Guidelines 0.0%

1 upward departures

Below Guidelines 0.0%

0 downward departures

Booker Variance 0.0%

0 post-Booker variances

What the Alaska District Data Reveals

In FY2024, the Alaska District (9th Circuit, Alaska) sentenced 311 federal defendants, with an average imposed sentence of 125.2 months. Of those cases, 1% were sentenced within the U.S. Sentencing Commission guideline range, 0% received above-guideline sentences, and 0% received below-guideline sentences. Prison was imposed in 97% of cases, and 54% of defendants resolved their cases through a guilty plea rather than trial.

Relative to the national average for the same offense mix, the Alaska District ran a disparity of +11.0% in FY2024. Sentences here trended longer than the nationwide benchmark after controlling for offense composition. Booker variances — sentences imposed outside the guidelines under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) following United States v. Booker (2005) — accounted for 0% of dispositions.

Context matters: these figures reflect the specific offense mix handled by the Alaska District, which drives much of the variation across federal courts. The top offense category was "RICO" with 67 cases and an average sentence of 50.0 months. Figures are aggregate descriptive statistics from USSC Individual Offender Datafiles and do not account for criminal history, offense-level adjustments, or cooperation agreements at the individual case level. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Data

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. The Alaska District is part of the 9th Circuit.

"Within guidelines" means the sentence fell within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects post-United States v. Booker variances where judges impose sentences outside the range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · Methodology: see how we compute these metrics

Nearby Districts in the 9th Circuit

Other federal district courts in the same circuit. Compare sentencing patterns across neighboring jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average federal sentence in the Alaska District?
In FY2024, the Alaska District Court imposed an average federal sentence of 125.2 months across 311 cases. This includes all offense types handled by the district.
How often do judges in Alaska follow the sentencing guidelines?
In FY2024, 1% of sentences in the Alaska District fell within the federal sentencing guidelines range. 0% were above guidelines (upward departures) and 0% were below guidelines (downward departures).
What is a sentencing disparity score?
The disparity score measures how far a district's average sentences deviate from the national average for the same offense types. A positive score means the district sentences higher than average; a negative score means lower. The Alaska District had a disparity of +11.0% in FY2024.
What is a Booker variance in federal sentencing?
A Booker variance occurs when a federal judge imposes a sentence outside the guidelines range under the authority of United States v. Booker (2005), citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In the Alaska District, 0% of cases in FY2024 involved Booker variances.
Where does the Alaska District sentencing data come from?
All data comes from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Individual Offender Datafiles, covering fiscal years 2015 through 2024. The USSC collects case-level data from federal courts nationwide.