New Mexico vs. Wyoming

What This New Mexico vs. Wyoming Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the New Mexico District (10th Circuit) handled 2,634 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 22.6 months, while the Wyoming District (10th Circuit) handled 445 cases at an average of 75.7 months. That is a 53.1-month gap — the Wyoming District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: New processed roughly 5.9× more defendants than Wyoming, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In New Mexico, 18% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 2% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Wyoming, the corresponding figures were 4% within, 2% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 98% vs. 92%, and prison-sentence rates at 89% vs. 91% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, New Mexico ran a disparity of -29.0% and Wyoming ran +11.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.