Middle Tennessee vs. New Mexico
Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC
Guideline Compliance Breakdown
Middle Tennessee
6th CircuitNew Mexico
10th CircuitFull Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Middle Tennessee | New Mexico | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg Sentence (months) | 137.0 | 22.6 | Mexico |
| Total Cases | 328 | 2,634 | |
| Within Guidelines % | 37% | 14% | Tennessee |
| Above Guidelines % | 5% | 2% | Mexico |
| Below Guidelines % | 58% | 85% | |
| Guilty Plea Rate | 70% | 98% | |
| Prison Sentence Rate | 96% | 89% | |
| Disparity vs. National | +45.5% | -29.0% | Mexico |
Top Offenses (FY2024)
What This Middle Tennessee vs. New Mexico Comparison Reveals
In FY2024, the Middle Tennessee District (6th Circuit) handled 328 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 137.0 months, while the New Mexico District (10th Circuit) handled 2,634 cases at an average of 22.6 months. That is a 114.4-month gap - the Middle District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: New processed roughly 8× more defendants than Middle, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.
Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Middle Tennessee sentenced 37% within the range, 5% above, and 58% below. In New Mexico, the corresponding figures were 14% within, 2% above, and 85% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 70% vs. 98%, and prison-sentence rates at 96% vs. 89% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.
Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Middle Tennessee ran a disparity of +45.5% and New Mexico ran -29.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.
About This Comparison
Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics
Related District Comparisons
Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.