6th Circuit vs. 10th Circuit

Middle Tennessee vs. New Mexico

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
137.0 mo
Middle Tennessee
vs
22.6 mo
New Mexico
Middle sentences 114.4 mo longer
Cases (FY2024)
328
Middle Tennessee
vs
2,634
New Mexico
New handles 8× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
+45.5%
Middle Tennessee
vs
-29.0%
New Mexico

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Middle Tennessee

6th Circuit
Within Guidelines 37% (119)
Above Guidelines 5% (16)
Below Guidelines 58% (184)
Guilty Pleas
70%
Prison Sentences
96%

New Mexico

10th Circuit
Within Guidelines 14% (343)
Above Guidelines 2% (39)
Below Guidelines 85% (2,113)
Guilty Pleas
98%
Prison Sentences
89%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Middle Tennessee New Mexico Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 137.0 22.6 Mexico
Total Cases 328 2,634
Within Guidelines % 37% 14% Tennessee
Above Guidelines % 5% 2% Mexico
Below Guidelines % 58% 85%
Guilty Plea Rate 70% 98%
Prison Sentence Rate 96% 89%
Disparity vs. National +45.5% -29.0% Mexico

What This Middle Tennessee vs. New Mexico Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Middle Tennessee District (6th Circuit) handled 328 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 137.0 months, while the New Mexico District (10th Circuit) handled 2,634 cases at an average of 22.6 months. That is a 114.4-month gap - the Middle District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: New processed roughly 8× more defendants than Middle, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Middle Tennessee sentenced 37% within the range, 5% above, and 58% below. In New Mexico, the corresponding figures were 14% within, 2% above, and 85% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 70% vs. 98%, and prison-sentence rates at 96% vs. 89% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Middle Tennessee ran a disparity of +45.5% and New Mexico ran -29.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Middle Tennessee 6th Circuit · Tennessee · 328 cases in FY2024
New Mexico 10th Circuit · New Mexico · 2,634 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.