7th Circuit vs. 7th Circuit

Central Illinois vs. Eastern Wisconsin

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
69.2 mo
Central Illinois
vs
97.7 mo
Eastern Wisconsin
Central sentences 28.5 mo shorter
Cases (FY2024)
549
Central Illinois
vs
539
Eastern Wisconsin
Central handles 1× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
+15.2%
Central Illinois
vs
+10.0%
Eastern Wisconsin

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Central Illinois

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 29% (142)
Above Guidelines 2% (11)
Below Guidelines 69% (342)
Guilty Pleas
90%
Prison Sentences
90%

Eastern Wisconsin

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 45% (229)
Above Guidelines 4% (19)
Below Guidelines 52% (266)
Guilty Pleas
89%
Prison Sentences
95%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Central Illinois Eastern Wisconsin Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 69.2 97.7 Illinois
Total Cases 549 539
Within Guidelines % 29% 45% Wisconsin
Above Guidelines % 2% 4% Illinois
Below Guidelines % 69% 52%
Guilty Plea Rate 90% 89%
Prison Sentence Rate 90% 95%
Disparity vs. National +15.2% +10.0% Wisconsin

What This Central Illinois vs. Eastern Wisconsin Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Central Illinois District (7th Circuit) handled 549 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 69.2 months, while the Eastern Wisconsin District (7th Circuit) handled 539 cases at an average of 97.7 months. That is a 28.5-month gap - the Eastern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Central processed roughly 1× more defendants than Eastern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Central Illinois sentenced 29% within the range, 2% above, and 69% below. In Eastern Wisconsin, the corresponding figures were 45% within, 4% above, and 52% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 90% vs. 89%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 95% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Central Illinois ran a disparity of +15.2% and Eastern Wisconsin ran +10.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Central Illinois 7th Circuit · Illinois · 549 cases in FY2024
Eastern Wisconsin 7th Circuit · Wisconsin · 539 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.