8th Circuit vs. 8th Circuit

Eastern Arkansas vs. Western Arkansas

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
26.0 mo
Eastern Arkansas
vs
106.3 mo
Western Arkansas
Eastern sentences 80.3 mo shorter
Cases (FY2024)
8,035
Eastern Arkansas
vs
437
Western Arkansas
Eastern handles 18.4× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
-5.0%
Eastern Arkansas
vs
+21.3%
Western Arkansas

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Eastern Arkansas

8th Circuit
Within Guidelines 47% (3,755)
Above Guidelines 8% (682)
Below Guidelines N/A (0)
Booker Variance N/A (0)
Guilty Pleas
23%
Prison Sentences
89%

Western Arkansas

8th Circuit
Within Guidelines 6% (27)
Above Guidelines 0% (2)
Below Guidelines N/A (0)
Booker Variance N/A (0)
Guilty Pleas
87%
Prison Sentences
97%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Eastern Arkansas Western Arkansas Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 26.0 106.3 Arkansas
Total Cases 8,035 437
Within Guidelines % 47% 6% Arkansas
Above Guidelines % 8% 0% Arkansas
Below Guidelines % N/A N/A
Guilty Plea Rate 23% 87%
Prison Sentence Rate 89% 97%
Disparity vs. National -5.0% +21.3% Arkansas

What This Eastern Arkansas vs. Western Arkansas Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Eastern Arkansas District (8th Circuit) handled 8,035 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 26.0 months, while the Western Arkansas District (8th Circuit) handled 437 cases at an average of 106.3 months. That is a 80.3-month gap — the Western District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Eastern processed roughly 18.4× more defendants than Western, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Eastern Arkansas, 47% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 8% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Western Arkansas, the corresponding figures were 6% within, 0% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 23% vs. 87%, and prison-sentence rates at 89% vs. 97% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Eastern Arkansas ran a disparity of -5.0% and Western Arkansas ran +21.3%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Eastern Arkansas 8th Circuit · Arkansas · 8,035 cases in FY2024
Western Arkansas 8th Circuit · Arkansas · 437 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Percentages are calculated from the total sentenced cases for each district in FY2024. "Within guidelines" means the judge imposed a sentence within the prescribed guidelines range. "Booker variance" reflects sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) outside the guidelines range.

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.