Colorado vs. Eastern Wisconsin
Federal sentencing comparison · FY2025 · Source: USSC
Guideline Compliance Breakdown
Colorado
10th CircuitEastern Wisconsin
7th CircuitFull Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Colorado | Eastern Wisconsin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg Sentence (months) | 68.7 | 57.9 | Wisconsin |
| Total Cases | 377 | 302 | |
| Within Guidelines % | 28% | 18% | Colorado |
| Above Guidelines % | 4% | 3% | Wisconsin |
| Below Guidelines % | 68% | 79% | |
| Guilty Plea Rate | 95% | 100% | |
| Prison Sentence Rate | 92% | 85% | |
| Disparity vs. National | +8.1% | -16.4% | Wisconsin |
Top Offenses (FY2025)
What This Colorado vs. Eastern Wisconsin Comparison Reveals
In FY2025, the Colorado District (10th Circuit) handled 377 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 68.7 months, while the Eastern Wisconsin District (7th Circuit) handled 302 cases at an average of 57.9 months. That is a 10.8-month gap - the Colorado District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Colorado processed roughly 1.2× more defendants than Eastern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.
Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Colorado sentenced 28% within the range, 4% above, and 68% below. In Eastern Wisconsin, the corresponding figures were 18% within, 3% above, and 79% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 95% vs. 100%, and prison-sentence rates at 92% vs. 85% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.
Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Colorado ran a disparity of +8.1% and Eastern Wisconsin ran -16.4%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.
About This Comparison
Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2025. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2025; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics
Related District Comparisons
Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.