7th Circuit vs. 7th Circuit

Central Illinois vs. Northern Indiana

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
69.2 mo
Central Illinois
vs
91.0 mo
Northern Indiana
Central sentences 21.8 mo shorter
Cases (FY2024)
549
Central Illinois
vs
224
Northern Indiana
Central handles 2.5× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
+15.2%
Central Illinois
vs
+13.0%
Northern Indiana

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Central Illinois

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 29% (142)
Above Guidelines 2% (11)
Below Guidelines 69% (342)
Guilty Pleas
90%
Prison Sentences
90%

Northern Indiana

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 56% (113)
Above Guidelines 11% (22)
Below Guidelines 33% (67)
Guilty Pleas
62%
Prison Sentences
90%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Central Illinois Northern Indiana Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 69.2 91.0 Illinois
Total Cases 549 224
Within Guidelines % 29% 56% Indiana
Above Guidelines % 2% 11% Illinois
Below Guidelines % 69% 33%
Guilty Plea Rate 90% 62%
Prison Sentence Rate 90% 90%
Disparity vs. National +15.2% +13.0% Indiana

What This Central Illinois vs. Northern Indiana Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Central Illinois District (7th Circuit) handled 549 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 69.2 months, while the Northern Indiana District (7th Circuit) handled 224 cases at an average of 91.0 months. That is a 21.8-month gap - the Northern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Central processed roughly 2.5× more defendants than Northern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Central Illinois sentenced 29% within the range, 2% above, and 69% below. In Northern Indiana, the corresponding figures were 56% within, 11% above, and 33% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 90% vs. 62%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 90% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Central Illinois ran a disparity of +15.2% and Northern Indiana ran +13.0%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Central Illinois 7th Circuit · Illinois · 549 cases in FY2024
Northern Indiana 7th Circuit · Indiana · 224 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.