7th Circuit vs. 7th Circuit

Central Illinois vs. Northern Illinois

Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC

For educational and research purposes only. Not legal advice. Average-sentence gaps between districts reflect each district's offense mix, cooperation rates, and caseload composition along with judicial practice - not judicial character alone.
Avg Sentence (FY2024)
69.2 mo
Central Illinois
vs
108.2 mo
Northern Illinois
Central sentences 39.0 mo shorter
Cases (FY2024)
549
Central Illinois
vs
390
Northern Illinois
Central handles 1.4× more cases
Disparity vs. National Avg
+15.2%
Central Illinois
vs
+25.9%
Northern Illinois

Guideline Compliance Breakdown

Central Illinois

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 29% (142)
Above Guidelines 2% (11)
Below Guidelines 69% (342)
Guilty Pleas
90%
Prison Sentences
90%

Northern Illinois

7th Circuit
Within Guidelines 33% (123)
Above Guidelines 3% (11)
Below Guidelines 64% (242)
Guilty Pleas
77%
Prison Sentences
93%

Full Metrics Comparison

Metric Central Illinois Northern Illinois Winner
Avg Sentence (months) 69.2 108.2 Illinois
Total Cases 549 390
Within Guidelines % 29% 33% Illinois
Above Guidelines % 2% 3% Illinois
Below Guidelines % 69% 64%
Guilty Plea Rate 90% 77%
Prison Sentence Rate 90% 93%
Disparity vs. National +15.2% +25.9% Illinois

What This Central Illinois vs. Northern Illinois Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Central Illinois District (7th Circuit) handled 549 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 69.2 months, while the Northern Illinois District (7th Circuit) handled 390 cases at an average of 108.2 months. That is a 39.0-month gap - the Northern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Central processed roughly 1.4× more defendants than Northern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Central Illinois sentenced 29% within the range, 2% above, and 69% below. In Northern Illinois, the corresponding figures were 33% within, 3% above, and 64% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 90% vs. 77%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 93% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Central Illinois ran a disparity of +15.2% and Northern Illinois ran +25.9%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.

About This Comparison

Central Illinois 7th Circuit · Illinois · 549 cases in FY2024
Northern Illinois 7th Circuit · Illinois · 390 cases in FY2024

Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics

Related District Comparisons

Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.