New Hampshire vs. Rhode Island

What This New Hampshire vs. Rhode Island Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the New Hampshire District (1st Circuit) handled 118 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 44.5 months, while the Rhode Island District (1st Circuit) handled 1,120 cases at an average of 71.4 months. That is a 26.9-month gap — the Rhode District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Rhode processed roughly 9.5× more defendants than New, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In New Hampshire, 10% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 4% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Rhode Island, the corresponding figures were 6% within, 9% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 94% vs. 88%, and prison-sentence rates at 88% vs. 87% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, New Hampshire ran a disparity of -34.5% and Rhode Island ran -23.7%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.