Puerto Rico vs. Rhode Island

What This Puerto Rico vs. Rhode Island Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Puerto Rico District (1st Circuit) handled 179 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 68.7 months, while the Rhode Island District (1st Circuit) handled 1,120 cases at an average of 71.4 months. That is a 2.7-month gap — the Rhode District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Rhode processed roughly 6.3× more defendants than Puerto, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Puerto Rico, 8% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 4% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Rhode Island, the corresponding figures were 6% within, 9% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 96% vs. 88%, and prison-sentence rates at 92% vs. 87% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Puerto Rico ran a disparity of -27.6% and Rhode Island ran -23.7%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.