Montana vs. Western Washington

What This Montana vs. Western Washington Comparison Reveals

In FY2024, the Montana District (9th Circuit) handled 1,696 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 30.3 months, while the Western Washington District (9th Circuit) handled 340 cases at an average of 74.1 months. That is a 43.8-month gap — the Western District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Montana processed roughly 5× more defendants than Western, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.

Guideline compliance diverges as well. In Montana, 35% of cases were sentenced within the guideline range, 0% above, and N/A% below, with Booker variances in N/A% of dispositions. In Western Washington, the corresponding figures were 5% within, 8% above, N/A% below, and N/A% Booker variances. Guilty-plea rates ran at 77% vs. 84%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 84% respectively — metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.

Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Montana ran a disparity of -11.2% and Western Washington ran -4.5%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics — individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.