Montana vs. Northern Mariana Islands
Federal sentencing comparison · FY2024 · Source: USSC
Guideline Compliance Breakdown
Montana
9th CircuitNorthern Mariana Islands
9th CircuitFull Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Montana | Northern Mariana Islands | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg Sentence (months) | 30.3 | 75.5 | Montana |
| Total Cases | 1,696 | 97 | |
| Within Guidelines % | 38% | 66% | Islands |
| Above Guidelines % | 3% | 1% | Islands |
| Below Guidelines % | 58% | 33% | |
| Guilty Plea Rate | 77% | 81% | |
| Prison Sentence Rate | 90% | 85% | |
| Disparity vs. National | -11.2% | -33.2% | Islands |
Top Offenses (FY2024)
What This Montana vs. Northern Mariana Islands Comparison Reveals
In FY2024, the Montana District (9th Circuit) handled 1,696 federal sentencings with an average imposed term of 30.3 months, while the Northern Mariana Islands District (9th Circuit) handled 97 cases at an average of 75.5 months. That is a 45.2-month gap - the Northern District sentences longer on average. Case volume alone tells part of the story: Montana processed roughly 17.5× more defendants than Northern, which affects guideline compliance patterns and the mix of offenses each court sees.
Guideline compliance diverges as well. Among cases with a determinable guideline range, Montana sentenced 38% within the range, 3% above, and 58% below. In Northern Mariana Islands, the corresponding figures were 66% within, 1% above, and 33% below. Guilty-plea rates ran at 77% vs. 81%, and prison-sentence rates at 90% vs. 85% respectively, metrics that capture both charging practice and judicial discretion across the two courts.
Set against the nationwide benchmark for the same offense mix, Montana ran a disparity of -11.2% and Northern Mariana Islands ran -33.2%. That comparison adjusts for the offense mix each district actually handles, so it isolates court-level patterns from pure caseload composition. Readers should still treat these as aggregate descriptive statistics, individual cases turn on criminal history, specific guideline adjustments, cooperation agreements, and statutory mandatory minimums that the district averages cannot resolve. This data is presented for research and educational purposes only and is not legal advice.
About This Comparison
Source: United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), Individual Offender Datafiles, FY2015–FY2024. Within/above/below percentages are computed over cases with a determinable guideline range in FY2024; guilty-plea and prison rates are over all sentenced cases. "Within guidelines" means the imposed sentence fell within the calculated guideline range; "above" and "below" are upward and downward departures or variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Source: USSC Commission Datafiles · How we compute these metrics
Related District Comparisons
Other sentencing comparisons involving these districts or their circuit peers.